marypcbuk: (Default)

I'm sorry I pushed Danny Sullivan over the edge; despite having disagreed with him fairly publicly in the past, I'd hate to think there was any ill will between us. I hope didn't actually push past him at the Surface event at any point, when I was reaching across the tables and touching the screens on the Surface units we were being shown, or when I picked up the Touch Cover and Type Cover and tried typing on them, or when I was talking to folks from the Windows team after the formal demos and getting them to show me more things on the Surfaces they were carrying or when I went back to the first table with the various Surface units on them and asked the PR folks if I could pick them up and take pictures of the ports and compare the size to the hefty tablet PC I carry or when one of them offered to take a photo of me trying the Surface on my knee to see if I'm going to be able to use one perched on a chair in a press conference - we don't do much of our work at tables in this job - although that one wasn't turned on (you can see that in the second photo, which is the one that ran with the piece I wrote).

As they say on the Internet, pix or it didn't happen...

Yes, I can balance the Surface on my knees

I didn't recognise him in our group or I'd have said hello, but I was concentrating on the Surfaces and the Microsoft spokespeople so I couldn't tell you who else was doing what. I get a little single-minded at press events (and the queuing and the waiting and the sitting and the queuing and the milling around and squeezing in questions as presenters roll through their pre-prepared demos? that's how every press event works; try CES Unveiled for the worst example of this - this year I was hit on the head by the BBC's camera operator twice and in the back of the head by two other video cameras in the two hours of the event; at least this time we got to sit down and there was only one fluffy 8" mike between me and the tablets. And LA traffic? Try driving down the strip from LVCC to the Venetian for meetings in under half an hour - one year Simon proved you can walk it faster. But I tend to think all of this is like the butcher complaining about the lard getting under their fingernails when all you want to do is buy the finished sausage).



Did I get to take a Surface and play with it as much as I wanted to? No, and none of the journalists did. At the Surface sneak peak Microsoft took its caution about Windows RT to the point of caginess; perhaps they hadn't got out of the habits of secrecy they developed in the underground bunker. Or perhaps it's because this event was the first public reveal of the Windows RT 'bet the company' strategy. For all the talk of a plus PC world rather than a post PC one, even Microsoft can't deny the impact of the iPad. Microsoft's response to the iPad is partly Windows RT and partly Windows 8 tablets and both are too important to leave to the OEMs who've been screwing up PCs so badly for the last few years. 83 running processes of crapware and duplicate utilities when you turn on a PC? Please... Windows 8 is a bet the company strategy with classic PCs, tablets, Windows RT tablets, servers and Windows Phone all in the same hand of cards (along with Xbox). No wonder senior Microsoft folk looked reserved and scripted on stage, with Ballmer in an intense rather than an energetic mood. And no wonder Microsoft wants to keep control of every stage of the reveal. But this isn't an Apple-style 'here it is, buy it' approach; Microsoft believes in giving everyone notice. Look at the intense detail on the Building Windows blog. And look at this event as not just sending a message to the OEMs that the quality level needs to go up (I've referred to this as adding another gesture to Windows, one made with a single finger); this is notice to consumers that there will be another tablet on the market and to developers that yes, Microsoft really is serious about WinRT apps. But with a couple of hundred journalists and perhaps 20 or 30 tablets at the event, a free for all, take it and try to break it review session wasn't exactly practical.

That's why what I wrote up as my impressions of the tablet is labelled as a hands-on rather than an in-depth review; those go on for 8-10 pages, not 3. TechRadar has a very transparent policy* about 'hands-on' writeups, which is right there on the same page as my piece; the writer has to actually have had their hands on the device, even for a short time** (press events are crowded (see above) and I'm used to having the new product I'm holding taken out of my hands by other journalists, or having them take photographs of it while it's in my hands; I do draw the line at video journalists who film me while I'm asking questions about a product to use on their site or as background footage in their TV show - my usual retaliation is to start scratching my nose or to gaze directly at the camera, because I am not your B-roll). I've learned to be persistent and to grab my opportunities and after twenty years of covering hardware, I can usually gather my impressions of a new product fairly quickly, especially when I've been covering Windows 8 in depth since it was first mentioned at CES 2011 (I saw a Windows RT demo just last week at TechEd, I've been using a Windows 8 tablet daily since January this year and I've seen the technology behind the keyboard before, at CES 2010) and there's been a lengthy presentation covering the details, so I can concentrate on looking at how the product comes together. That's what I was trying to do in my write-up; give my impression and opinion of what Surface RT is like, given the information I have and the experience I've had of having my hands on the product.

I liked the feel of Surface in my hands; I like the balance of it, the way the 22-degree angles of the edges sit in your hand (the keyboard connector is too sharp unless it has the keyboard in, when it feels like an expensive, slim hardback volume - Folio Society, say). I like the way the keyboard snaps into place and locks securely; Simon got to try snapping it in place and out for longer than I did, but we both had a go. I love the sound of the hinge closing; I'm not sure if Danny was still standing next to me when one of the Surface team handed me a Surface and showed me the groove for popping the hinge open quickly and I'm sure I looked odd holding the Surface up to my ear with my head on one side and snapping it open and shut repeatedly. I spent quite some time stroking the soft-but-strong fabric backing of the keyboard to get a feel for whether it will snag as well as trying the action of the Type version and the key spacing on both at the end of the event when the news writers were tucked away in the corner writing their news stories. Because I do features, reviews and analysis more than news, I can take more time to look and touch and ask questions and gather the materials for drawing conclusions.

Would I write a piece that I called a hands on without touching the device I was covering? No. Am I a bit more persistent about getting my hands on things? Apparently so ;-) Do I tend to have a lot to say about things I'm interested in? That too ;-)




* TechRadar: What is a hands on review?
'Hands on reviews' are a journalist's first impressions of a piece of kit based on spending some time with it. It may be just a few moments, or a few hours. The important thing is we have been able to play with it ourselves and can give you some sense of what it's like to use, even if it's only an embryonic view. For more information, see
TechRadar's Reviews Guarantee.

** Want to discuss the minimum bar for reviews, hands-on writeups and other coverage? Let's. I'm old school; unless it's an official statement or has three independent sources, it's a rumour. We're years past being able to say we don't review anything that's in beta, though, and the combination of ad-funded online content and the way people will click through to read the craziest rumours (cough Digitimes cough) is pushing tech journalism to produce more coverage from less hard information. I want to be writing longer analysis, in depth features and considered pieces. Often, I'll have plenty of background that I want to cover along with the hands on experience, that I believe explains why some of the features I talk about work the way they do.



EDIT Apologies to those who have left rational comments & questions; owing to the comments that I don't feel are suitable for publishing, I'm disabling comments on this post. That goes for engaging in discussions by email as well, or on other blogs because I have really nothing to add to all this.

The most common rational question was did I type on the keyboard? Yes, I have pressed keys and produced results on screen. I have not done a full-length live typing test, hence the lack of a detailed discussion of the action of the keyboard. The simulated typing was for the purpose of assessing balance, not because I think you can tell what a keyboard is like to type on when not connected to a running device, and my disclosure that the balance while typing evaluation was on a Surface that wasn't powered up was for complete transparency but mostly to reassure other journalists who thought I might be getting special treatment rather than being, you know, persistent.

How long did I spend with Surface? Didn't time it. We saw units in the audience while we were waiting for our 5.50 slot, then I was in the demo room seeing & touching Surface units, taking photographs and talking to the Surface team for at least 45 minutes (based on the times in the EXIF data of my photographs).

To answer perhaps the most paranoid of the suggestions so far, yes, the Touch Cover is a real, working keyboard, not some fake mockup. (There might have been prototypes in the demo area, but we saw working keyboard connected and working.) Here's a couple of pictures of people (not me, people from Microsoft) using Touch Covers - note the scroll bar that appears at the bottom of the Start screen in the first image because the trackpad is in use and the pressure bars generated by the keys in the second image; you can also see them in action yourself on the Surface launch video around the 28 minute mark. On the video you can see the fingers hitting keys and things happening on screen, just in case you don't believe a still image.

real keyboard
touch pressure
marypcbuk: (Default)
I'm expecting a slew of 'if there's a desktop in Windows on ARM why can't I write apps for it?' posts. The answer is very clearly in the epic blog post Steven Sinofsky published today, but I'm going to excerpt it here (although if you can't read the blog post and understand it, I don't trust you to write desktop applications).

"If we enabled the broad porting of existing code we would fail to deliver on our commitment to longer battery life, predictable performance, and especially a reliable experience over time. The conventions used by today’s Windows apps do not necessarily provide this, whether it is background processes, polling loops, timers, system hooks, startup programs, registry changes, kernel mode code, admin rights, unsigned drivers, add-ins, or a host of other common techniques. By avoiding these constructs, WOA can deliver on a new level of customer satisfaction: your WOA PC will continue to perform well over time as apps are isolated from the system and each other, and you will remain in control of what additional software is running on your behalf, all while letting the capabilities of diverse hardware shine through."

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2012/02/09/building-windows-for-the-arm-processor-architecture.aspx

If you find the 8,000+ words in the Building Windows blog a little long, my interview with Steven Sinofsky is a little more succinct, at only a quarter of the length ;)
http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/windows-8-on-arm-steven-sinofsky-speaks-1062176
marypcbuk: (Default)
I was hoping that the Fujitsu Stylistic Q550 might be it: I need more time with it to decide. This is a good size, with good battery life but how good is the new Atom and how good is the combined active pen and touch screen from N-Trig?

Hands on with the Fujitsu Stylistic Q550: http://www.techradar.com/news/mobile-computing/tablets/hands-on-fujitsu-stylistic-q550-review-980280
marypcbuk: (Default)
The Android 3.1 update for the Google IO Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 is a good way to see what Google intends with Honeycomb. As this has neither the Google Experience nor a third-party skin, what you get is as close to stock Android as we're likely to see, which means that the updates aren't obscured by different interfaces on top. And what you get in the Honeycomb 3.1 update is more about stability than features...

read the rest at TechRadar
marypcbuk: (Default)
I use a tablet PC every day, for handwritten notes and diagrams, or just using my finger to scroll or tap a button. But a pen isn't just for writing; it's for drawing and sketching and painting. There are some superb art apps for tablets on all the different platforms and it's surprising how much being able to experiment and undo unleashes your creativity. I've always thought I can't draw or paint, but I'm pretty sure I could learn to be a lot better at it than I am, especially using the right tools.

I spent a couple of weeks painting and sketching and wrote up the software side - and the opportunities, with a followup on the tools that make a difference, like the awesome Nomad Brush.
Tablet artistry - making art on screen http://www.tomsguide.com/us/tablet-artistic-paint-software,review-1669.html
Better than a finger - the right tablet tools http://www.tomsguide.com/us/tablet-artistry-stylus-brush,review-1676.html

And here's the kind of art I was making
sunset abruptly
marypcbuk: (Default)

What Windows 8 needs to compete on tablets - is Windows

Microsoft knows where it’s going with Windows 8 and that’s a very different direction from any other tablet maker. And it's been going there since before the iPad came along...

http://www.techradar.com/news/mobile-computing/tablets/microsoft-we-know-where-we-re-going-with-windows-8-tablets-966757


Microsoft hints at a release date for Windows 8
A senior ‘softie does the same calculation we’ve been doing for months and comes up with the same answer; more importantly, he reveals more about how Microsoft sees tablets, phones and PCs…

http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/microsoft-hints-at-windows-8-release-date-966233

marypcbuk: (Default)
I like my Tablet PC; I couldn't get along without handwriting and digital ink and sketching and finger scrolling. But aside from OneNote and ArtRage, what apps really take advantage of Windows touch and pen? And the fact that there's so few is the problem Windows 8 really needs to solve...

http://www.techradar.com/news/mobile-computing/10-best-windows-7-tablet-apps-953677
marypcbuk: (Default)
Is the Samsung Galaxy Tab a nicer tablet than the Archos 10? (no, but it has better accessories)
Can taking most of the copper out and messing up the impedence on purpose make a cable work better? (yes, with this lovely piece of design and I can't wait to get some SmartCables)
Is the Lenovo wireless USB remote control an admission of guilt? (if this is what you need to navigate a UI remotely, heaven help us)

There's more details and another seven really cool things in my CTIA roundup on Tom's Guide; what's your favourite?
marypcbuk: (Default)

Universal search is still pretty new on the Blackberry, as you only get it with BlackBerry Search; in a session about how apps can work with it, I also caught some advance news: universal search will get voice search soon

Looking back at the PlayBook announcement, I continue to be impressed by what RIM is promising - and yes, this is hugely ambitious and RIM has to deliver it. The reason I'm not more sceptical is that QNX is already out there as an OS running on constrained hardware - that and the fact that Dan Dodge is (and I mean this as a compliment) a serious geek who loves his architecture. If he's this enthusiastic about the project, it makes me expect that he's seeing good results from the early builds. If RIM can deliver and developers can deliver, next year gets even more exciting than this one; serious tablets in the summer and Windows 8 (in some shape or form) in the autumn.

What am I actually excited about in the PlayBook? It's not the shiny prototypes, it's the architecture - a versatile OS that offers AIR, Flash, BlackBerry apps, POSIX apps, HTML 5, OpenGL games and true multi-tasking. 

marypcbuk: (Default)

Apart from the price. And the battery life (although Dan Dodge told me today "you shouldn't worry about it"; he can't say, but he knows what it is and he's happy. As the head of the QNX team at RIM, Dodge knows a lot more about the PlayBook and he told us quite a bit about it, from some details about the graphics processing to broad hints that there will be a 10" model at some point.

I have to say, I was prepared to be very underimpressed with the idea of a companion tablet and I'm still unsure - but I can't see carrrying a tablet and not having my phone with me, and I don't want to pay for two data plans. And the more I learn about QNX and what they're putting in the PlayBook, the more excited I get about it; I love tablet PC and OneNote, but I think I kind of want one...

Also: BlackBerry goes social with 'super apps'

The newer your BlackBerry, the more apps you use. 75% of App World downlaods are for BlackBerry 5 and 6. Now apps can get really social by hooking into BlackBerry Messenger - and they can be written in HTML 5 and still get all the BlackBerry features...

marypcbuk: (Default)
I've always said that the main reason Intel develops Moblin is to scare Microsoft; any time Redmond isn't playing ball, Intel holds up Moblin (I can't bring myself to call it MeeGo every time) like a scary hand puppet and waves it around until the 'softies cave in. Perhaps they haven't caved recently (or perhaps my utter speculation about Windows 8 on ARM is near to the bone), but Intel spokesperson James Reinders made some remarkably candid comments about Microsoft and Windows performance on Atom (twice, so it wasn't mis-speaking).

Personally I'm very happy with Windows 7 on Atom (in as much as I'm happy about Atom at all - I like the battery life but tend to hate the tiny keyboards), and I'm grateful that Windows VP Steven Sinosfky went through what must have been the pain of using a netbook as his main PC for months to make sure Windows 7 would make me happy (oh, and all you other Atom users too), but it did remind me that Origami died a death. Of course now that I know that Microsoft worked with Toshiba to create the nice, simple Media Controller interface on the JOURN.E Touch and that they brainstormed the 'three screens plus cloud' mantra together I'm wondering what we might see on the Windows 7 tablets that HP and, I think I can say, Toshiba will bring out this summer. 

Reinders also talked about Atom and embedded Atom in a way that made me think that Intel is trying to use Moblin/MeeGo as a scary puppet to wave at Google as well; Intel thinks embedded devices - smartphones, MIDs, what Qualcomm calls SmartBooks even though that's a trademark in Europe,in-car systems and all the other devices that are going Android and Chrome (or maybe RIM or - very successfully for Ford - Windows CE or, of course, iPhone and iPad) - need a better operating system. I'm inclined to agree - though of course I personally think it should be some variation of Windows 8 (I do seem to have a theme this week) rather than Moblin/MeeGo. But what I mostly think is that if Intel is using the same puppet to wave at both Google and Microsoft, then they are certainly wearing what an old friend of ours calls the Brave Trousers.
marypcbuk: (Default)

One of the reasons we went to Barcelona in the first place was to see what Toshiba was launching. There were TVs with Windows 7 logos (they do DLNA so you can send videos from Windwos 7 to your TV screen by right-clicking). There was a laptop with Intel's Wireless Display technology that sends your whole PC screen to a TV with a NETGEAR adapter. There were TVs with built-in YouTube players. There were some shiny new laptops. And then there was the final version of the JOURN.E Touch tablet that we played with when it wasn't ready, looking much easier to use and much more useful. Toshiba's very happy with it: it's half the price of the iPad, does Flash, has expandable memory - in short, they say 'The things the iPad doesn't do, we do'
The tablet-based, pre-iPad, post-iPad future, according to Toshiba

marypcbuk: (Default)

So I'm confused. Fusion Garage has responded to Crunchpad's toys out of the pram lawsuit with a press release, debating some of the points in the lawsuit. It has a little more detail about their defence than typically goes out before the actual court date, but hey, this one will get tried in the court of public opinion long before anything legal happens, so that's not what's puzzling me. It's this section.
Another example of Fusion Garage “doer status” in bringing the joojoo to market is the Company’s now defunct relationship with ODM Pegatron.  Fusion Garage established this relationship after Arrington’s promises of hardware development support proved to be hollow. Fusion Garage is now working with another top tier ODM to develop a completely new board and mechanical layout that is the basis for the joojoo. To state, as the lawsuit and accompanying blog post do, that Fusion Garage’s joojoo is based on any Pegatron IP is false.
So. Arrington said he'd find the hardware guys, but FG found their own hardware guys: points to FG. But then they're not using those hardware guys: does that mean FG didn't find good hardware guys? No points to FG. FG is sending out samples and making pre-sales: points to FG. But the new hardware guys are developing a completely new board and chassis. Either the old board and chassis weren't so hot (I saw Arrington say the Crunchpad could run for 'hours at a time' before crashing; um, that's not good, guys): no points to FG. Or they were good but for some reason FG aren't using them: again, no points to FG. And they're making pre-sales and sending out review units without having the actual product they're going to sell even designed yet? minus several million points to FG for vaporware at this point.

And am I the only person who remembers the Webpad debacle? sheesh...

marypcbuk: (Default)

the abstract fairground
Originally uploaded by marypcb.
This week, I have been most writing: I seem to have my productivity groove back and am already well into the next piece, but Tom's Guide have also been doing a fast turnaround on publishing (pace a new CMS which has a funny attitude to spaces between words).

I took this charmingly abstract photo while I was working on my review of the new SlingCatcher, which takes video slung by a Slingbox and catches it, on another TV. Also, if we didn't have a big-screen PC next to the TV if would be my favourite new way to watch online videos.

And Qualcomm wants you to know that they're behind a lot of this year's almost cool devices (G1, Storm, Xperia) and for next year they have manufacturers lined up for something rather different. With Intel plugging away at Atom and Moorestown and Qualcomm adding dual-core to Snapdragon, look for lots of interesting devices that might or might not count as PCs. The Snapdragon tablet is the perfect form factor for me, but as frequent readers will know, I remain dubious about consumer desktop Linux (even the shiny Apple one) - so obviously, I want one of these running Windows 7! Take a look and tell me why I'm wrong...


N.B.
I know the pieces don't have my name on yet; the new publishing system is being Tweaked to fix this ;-)

Profile

marypcbuk: (Default)
marypcbuk

March 2022

S M T W T F S
  12 34 5
6 7 89101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 21st, 2025 02:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios