marypcbuk: (Default)
Ex-Windows chief (as the shorthand goes) Steven Sinofsky is blogging about the principles and techniques of developing products. Hate Windows and Microsoft? Still worth a read because Sinofsky is a polymath and an omnivorous reader. ( was disappointed when he resigned from Microsoft, because he's one of the smart people it's so stimulating to have conversations with.

Yesterday he blogged about the shock horror response to the fact that his blog is on WordPress, using Google's Feedburner for RSS and that he took photos on the iPhone 5 he's currently trying out. I would be gritting my teeth at how much of a non story that is (let alone he no longer works at Microsoft,Sinofsky has frequently pointed out that if you don't know the ins and outs of competitive products you're not going to know how your own compare and Microsoft is no monoculture internally - and if you wonder why Bill and Melinda Gates don't buy their kids iPhones, ask yourself if Steve Jobs would have bought his kids an Android phone if they asked).

But then he casually name dropped Thucydides. Did I say, omnivore? And I thought about my view of Thucydides; that he wrote up the speeches he'd never heard to include what needed to be said. And I thought about Herodotus; father of history, father of lies. And I thought, there's nothing new under the sun.

Thucydides; history is my version of what they must have said that demonstrates the issues.
I see this a lot in blogs from people who believe they have insight into situations they weren't present at, and in conspiracy theories, and in decent op ed pieces too. It's the acceptable form of plot coupon, the dramatization.

Herodotus: history is this really great story I totally don't believe but you know, clicks!
And I see this, well, far too many places ;( But hey, great shaggy sheep tail story!
marypcbuk: (Default)
The recent Microsoft Exchange Conference was an interesting mix of nostalgia and news. The latest version of Exchange was code complete before the conference so the presenters were showing off the final version of Outlook Web Access (with offline access that definitely does now work in Metro IE on Windows 8/RT) and talking about the new architecture, which is an interesting match for features in Server 2012 like continuous availability, Hyper-V 3 and storage pools.

Just as interesting was the discussion about forthcoming trends - cheaper storage means storage quotas for email are an even sillier idea (you deprive workers of the information they find the most useful because you can't be bothered to fit a bigger hard drive), SSDs are always going to be the same premium over hard drive for the same capacity so it's too pricey for all your storage and it takes so long to identify hot data it's better to just use them as general integrated cache - and a look back at the reasons for previous architectures. There was a lot of looking back by attendees; mentions of Exchange 5.5 got ripples of laughter and groans, old arguments about switching to Exchange were still being rehashed over meals.

In more detail:
Exchange 2013 advantages - in house and in the cloud
Exchange 2013 will repair itself, run on cheap disks, enables the death of email quotas, and stop users sending mail that breaks company rules
(This was the article where my editor had to footnote and explain tribbles!)


No EAS logo, no email?
Exchange ActiveSync (EAS) doesn't just get email and calendar appointments onto almost every smartphone from just about every mail service; you can also use it to apply security policies to tablets and smartphones.

EAS is the 'de facto' standard for email synchronistation

However while EAS is proving so popular – Microsoft's Exchange corporate Vice President Rajesh Jha calls it a "de facto standard" – there are some inconsistencies in the way it works and Microsoft is working to make the protocol it licences to so many other companies a bit more standard in use.

marypcbuk: (Default)
There's a new Microsoft rumour. How should you respond? Groan, bury your head in the sand, stay off Twitter for the duration? Wade in with common sense and wear yourself out trying to own the #rumourcontrol hashtag? As either approach can lead to you wanting to drink yourself into oblivion, here's a handy Microsoft rumour drinking game. If you want, you can hum along with my Apple rumour ditty.

Read the rumour. Take a drink if:

1 The rumour originates on a foreign language site in a language you (and most tech journalists) can't read without a translation

2 The rumour is substantiated by
- a marketing person
- an employee of a Microsoft overseas subsidiary who has never been to Redmond
- an ex-Microsoft employee (take another slug if they're from a different division)
- a third-party hardware or software company
- unnamed 'sources close to the project'

Empty your glass if:

3 The rumour has done the rounds before and been given a carefully worded denial or a 'no further comment' in the past

4 It's a new rumour that gets a carefully worded denial or a 'no further comment' as soon as Redmond wakes up, drinks its coffee and stops laughing and weeping at the same time

Finish the bottle if:
5 It's a really, really, terrible, terminally, crippling stupid idea for Microsoft to do this

6 There's a perfectly rational alternative explanation for the information behind the rumour that we already know about, that could easily be misunderstood as justifying the rumour and that isn't nearly as interesting/scandalous/much fun
marypcbuk: (Default)
The recent appearance of chalked Surface images on a hipster New York wall has resulted in a dense semiotic analysis (no more truck PCs!), but there are some less humorous things to learn from the chalk art, which also showed up at the Surface launch in LA. I think they're really clever.

Red, pink and blue; bright colours for the Touch Covers that snap onto Surface and turn it into a notebook you can balance on your lap.


Dotted outline: the keyboard cover is optional and removable. But it's in every image, because it's going to be a huge part of the product story and you're going to want it.


16:9: when we picked up our badges for the Surface event, even before we saw PRs from the Windows team, we could tell it was going to be a tablet - because what else has the 16:9 ratio? And the dotted lines from the keyboard were used on things like the card with our demo slot on and the card with the Wi-Fi password on.

Even on the chalked keyboards you can see details like the two buttons for the touch pad or the markings for the home keys...

marypcbuk: (Default)

Funny you should ask ;-) My in-depth, full-length, yes-I-have-a-few-things-to-say review of Windows 8 RTM is up at TechRadar.

(Because of the structure of the site, it replaces the reviews of Developer Preview, Consumer Preview and Release Preview that I wrote, as well as some of the early news and rumour pieces; there are lots of other Windows 8 pieces I've written and I'll be putting a list of them up soon.)

Basically, I have been writing about Windows 8 since October 2009, looking at Windows 8 code since last September and using it as my main, full-time OS for the six months since CP came out. A back of the envelope calculation suggests I've spent at least 1,500 hours using it already...

What about this different interface then? How can you work without the Start menu?
I was fairly negative about the disruption I expected from having to context switch to a full screen interface instead of peering over at the Start menu. I mean I can get so distracted by Twitter that I forget why I switched to my browser in the first place. In practice? Not so much. Pressing the Start menu takes me back to where I was, pinned programs mean I can just work in the desktop nearly all of the time, the charm bar is so much faster as a way of getting to the control panel and other settings. yes, it's a different way of working in the Metro-style, WinRT apps, but no more different than an iPhone or an Android app and we all got used to those. Yes, that kind of app works much better with touch, but no, it all works perfectly well with a mouse and keyboard.

What do I miss?
Spider Solitaire; the deck in the desktop Spider was so much prettier than the XBox Live Spider I have in Windows 7. Love the animations when I win FreeCell though.

There are a couple of apps that need updating for 8 and I hope that happens quickly. The big thing I miss is a search result showing me emails and documents and results in OneNote all in the same search window.

Unified search in Vista and 7 was very useful. Now I have to do 2/3 searches in the desktop (I could quickly repeat a search in the Start screen but I can't search OneNote there and I don't get previews of document content). I called that a showstopper at once point, but there are so many other things about Windows 8 that I put up with losing it to have the advantages (faster boot, an extra hour of battery life being my two favourites; some lovely features in Explorer too).

Media Player doesn't see the Sonos as a Play To target any more, but I know that works for other people so I'm calling that an early issue. Media support is something that has to improve but that's device certification and polish in the apps rather than the fundamentals.

But won't businesses hate it? Because they'll have to train users and it's different?
I'm going to argue that if Windows RT is as big a success as the iPad, the training issue will solve itself. Businesses will love the improved security (the shift to managing by EAS/people & info centric security is certainly a jump but what we have now is so broken that it's pain either way), users will like the performance and battery improvements and the issue is then user acceptance around the interface. Great Windows RT devices and apps are what's needed most there.

Microsoft has indeed made a big bet, a bet-the-company bet here. Could it crash and burn horribly? yes, but I'll argue that if Microsoft hadn't done something this bold they've have gone out with a whimper instead of a bang anyway.

Why did you call it the Modern UI in your review; isn't that as un-final a name as Metro?
You have to call it something ;-) I did ask if I could put it in quotes but that doesn't look good in headlines, I think...

marypcbuk: (Default)

I'm sorry I pushed Danny Sullivan over the edge; despite having disagreed with him fairly publicly in the past, I'd hate to think there was any ill will between us. I hope didn't actually push past him at the Surface event at any point, when I was reaching across the tables and touching the screens on the Surface units we were being shown, or when I picked up the Touch Cover and Type Cover and tried typing on them, or when I was talking to folks from the Windows team after the formal demos and getting them to show me more things on the Surfaces they were carrying or when I went back to the first table with the various Surface units on them and asked the PR folks if I could pick them up and take pictures of the ports and compare the size to the hefty tablet PC I carry or when one of them offered to take a photo of me trying the Surface on my knee to see if I'm going to be able to use one perched on a chair in a press conference - we don't do much of our work at tables in this job - although that one wasn't turned on (you can see that in the second photo, which is the one that ran with the piece I wrote).

As they say on the Internet, pix or it didn't happen...

Yes, I can balance the Surface on my knees

I didn't recognise him in our group or I'd have said hello, but I was concentrating on the Surfaces and the Microsoft spokespeople so I couldn't tell you who else was doing what. I get a little single-minded at press events (and the queuing and the waiting and the sitting and the queuing and the milling around and squeezing in questions as presenters roll through their pre-prepared demos? that's how every press event works; try CES Unveiled for the worst example of this - this year I was hit on the head by the BBC's camera operator twice and in the back of the head by two other video cameras in the two hours of the event; at least this time we got to sit down and there was only one fluffy 8" mike between me and the tablets. And LA traffic? Try driving down the strip from LVCC to the Venetian for meetings in under half an hour - one year Simon proved you can walk it faster. But I tend to think all of this is like the butcher complaining about the lard getting under their fingernails when all you want to do is buy the finished sausage).



Did I get to take a Surface and play with it as much as I wanted to? No, and none of the journalists did. At the Surface sneak peak Microsoft took its caution about Windows RT to the point of caginess; perhaps they hadn't got out of the habits of secrecy they developed in the underground bunker. Or perhaps it's because this event was the first public reveal of the Windows RT 'bet the company' strategy. For all the talk of a plus PC world rather than a post PC one, even Microsoft can't deny the impact of the iPad. Microsoft's response to the iPad is partly Windows RT and partly Windows 8 tablets and both are too important to leave to the OEMs who've been screwing up PCs so badly for the last few years. 83 running processes of crapware and duplicate utilities when you turn on a PC? Please... Windows 8 is a bet the company strategy with classic PCs, tablets, Windows RT tablets, servers and Windows Phone all in the same hand of cards (along with Xbox). No wonder senior Microsoft folk looked reserved and scripted on stage, with Ballmer in an intense rather than an energetic mood. And no wonder Microsoft wants to keep control of every stage of the reveal. But this isn't an Apple-style 'here it is, buy it' approach; Microsoft believes in giving everyone notice. Look at the intense detail on the Building Windows blog. And look at this event as not just sending a message to the OEMs that the quality level needs to go up (I've referred to this as adding another gesture to Windows, one made with a single finger); this is notice to consumers that there will be another tablet on the market and to developers that yes, Microsoft really is serious about WinRT apps. But with a couple of hundred journalists and perhaps 20 or 30 tablets at the event, a free for all, take it and try to break it review session wasn't exactly practical.

That's why what I wrote up as my impressions of the tablet is labelled as a hands-on rather than an in-depth review; those go on for 8-10 pages, not 3. TechRadar has a very transparent policy* about 'hands-on' writeups, which is right there on the same page as my piece; the writer has to actually have had their hands on the device, even for a short time** (press events are crowded (see above) and I'm used to having the new product I'm holding taken out of my hands by other journalists, or having them take photographs of it while it's in my hands; I do draw the line at video journalists who film me while I'm asking questions about a product to use on their site or as background footage in their TV show - my usual retaliation is to start scratching my nose or to gaze directly at the camera, because I am not your B-roll). I've learned to be persistent and to grab my opportunities and after twenty years of covering hardware, I can usually gather my impressions of a new product fairly quickly, especially when I've been covering Windows 8 in depth since it was first mentioned at CES 2011 (I saw a Windows RT demo just last week at TechEd, I've been using a Windows 8 tablet daily since January this year and I've seen the technology behind the keyboard before, at CES 2010) and there's been a lengthy presentation covering the details, so I can concentrate on looking at how the product comes together. That's what I was trying to do in my write-up; give my impression and opinion of what Surface RT is like, given the information I have and the experience I've had of having my hands on the product.

I liked the feel of Surface in my hands; I like the balance of it, the way the 22-degree angles of the edges sit in your hand (the keyboard connector is too sharp unless it has the keyboard in, when it feels like an expensive, slim hardback volume - Folio Society, say). I like the way the keyboard snaps into place and locks securely; Simon got to try snapping it in place and out for longer than I did, but we both had a go. I love the sound of the hinge closing; I'm not sure if Danny was still standing next to me when one of the Surface team handed me a Surface and showed me the groove for popping the hinge open quickly and I'm sure I looked odd holding the Surface up to my ear with my head on one side and snapping it open and shut repeatedly. I spent quite some time stroking the soft-but-strong fabric backing of the keyboard to get a feel for whether it will snag as well as trying the action of the Type version and the key spacing on both at the end of the event when the news writers were tucked away in the corner writing their news stories. Because I do features, reviews and analysis more than news, I can take more time to look and touch and ask questions and gather the materials for drawing conclusions.

Would I write a piece that I called a hands on without touching the device I was covering? No. Am I a bit more persistent about getting my hands on things? Apparently so ;-) Do I tend to have a lot to say about things I'm interested in? That too ;-)




* TechRadar: What is a hands on review?
'Hands on reviews' are a journalist's first impressions of a piece of kit based on spending some time with it. It may be just a few moments, or a few hours. The important thing is we have been able to play with it ourselves and can give you some sense of what it's like to use, even if it's only an embryonic view. For more information, see
TechRadar's Reviews Guarantee.

** Want to discuss the minimum bar for reviews, hands-on writeups and other coverage? Let's. I'm old school; unless it's an official statement or has three independent sources, it's a rumour. We're years past being able to say we don't review anything that's in beta, though, and the combination of ad-funded online content and the way people will click through to read the craziest rumours (cough Digitimes cough) is pushing tech journalism to produce more coverage from less hard information. I want to be writing longer analysis, in depth features and considered pieces. Often, I'll have plenty of background that I want to cover along with the hands on experience, that I believe explains why some of the features I talk about work the way they do.



EDIT Apologies to those who have left rational comments & questions; owing to the comments that I don't feel are suitable for publishing, I'm disabling comments on this post. That goes for engaging in discussions by email as well, or on other blogs because I have really nothing to add to all this.

The most common rational question was did I type on the keyboard? Yes, I have pressed keys and produced results on screen. I have not done a full-length live typing test, hence the lack of a detailed discussion of the action of the keyboard. The simulated typing was for the purpose of assessing balance, not because I think you can tell what a keyboard is like to type on when not connected to a running device, and my disclosure that the balance while typing evaluation was on a Surface that wasn't powered up was for complete transparency but mostly to reassure other journalists who thought I might be getting special treatment rather than being, you know, persistent.

How long did I spend with Surface? Didn't time it. We saw units in the audience while we were waiting for our 5.50 slot, then I was in the demo room seeing & touching Surface units, taking photographs and talking to the Surface team for at least 45 minutes (based on the times in the EXIF data of my photographs).

To answer perhaps the most paranoid of the suggestions so far, yes, the Touch Cover is a real, working keyboard, not some fake mockup. (There might have been prototypes in the demo area, but we saw working keyboard connected and working.) Here's a couple of pictures of people (not me, people from Microsoft) using Touch Covers - note the scroll bar that appears at the bottom of the Start screen in the first image because the trackpad is in use and the pressure bars generated by the keys in the second image; you can also see them in action yourself on the Surface launch video around the 28 minute mark. On the video you can see the fingers hitting keys and things happening on screen, just in case you don't believe a still image.

real keyboard
touch pressure
marypcbuk: (Default)
There's a Russian blogger and consultant by the name of Eldar Murtazin who has in the past had surprisingly good success at getting advanced access to Windows Mobile, Nokia and other smartphone releases; way back when, he used to leak details that later turned out, from time to time, to be fairly accurate. In fact he had enough access that at one point, Nokia asked the Russian police to retrieve all the 'unauthorised' Nokia phones Murtazin had been writing about. Other Russian leaks gave us an early build of Office 2012 and several Windows 8 builds, along with a running commentary of internal build numbers. But recently, Murtazin and similar tipsters have had a far poorer record and their rumours range from dodgy to plain laughable.

Claims that Microsoft would buy Nokia or RIM don't make sense as a business model, and neither do rumours that Microsoft will sell its own PCs or tablets, because Microsoft doesn't compete with its OEM partners in the phone or PC market. At the time I demolished the rumour that a Windows 8 CTP would be unveiled at last year's Partner Conference. Now Windows Phone evangelist Brandon Watson has busted Murtazin's latest rumour, that Windows Phone 8, AKA Apollo, won't run Windows Phone 7 apps.

That's an even clearer version of the message Aaron Woodman gave me at CES: "We are absolutely dependent on developers falling in love with the product. It's so important to the value we ultimately deliver to the customer that they're always first." Murtazin is probably thinking of the discussion around what 'common core' means for Apollo and what the new kernel will be; I have my own theory but at this point no-one outside Redmond actually knows. Although I did also wonder if he'd read too much into something else Woodman said to me: "We will always have to evolve - this an incredibly scary competitive space. There will always be challenges with backwards compatibility, but that's the price of innovation."

Rumours are fun (unless they're so far off base they're infuriating) and so is the detective work of digging through job postings and technical documentation and conference presentations to spot connections and make deductions. One of the pieces I'm proudest of writing last year explains how the Metro interface in Windows 8 relies on HTML5 standards that Microsoft built into IE9 and IE10. At the time we thought Microsoft was just catching up to the open Web but when I saw the first Metro demo, I recognised some principles and techniques and put two and two together. Simon and I have just thrown our hat into the ring over on Ed Bott's blog with predictions for the dates when we'll see the consumer preview and other milestones for Windows 8, though that's more like informed guesswork.

Of course, crazy rumours get clicks - though there's an issue if your crazy rumours are always wrong. There's one mobile news site I used to respect that has come out with so many batshit rumours recently that I now dismiss everything they say as more wolf-crying. That's where the Russian rumours seem to be ending up these days.

The problem may be that they've been too good. Microsoft and Nokia have been far more protective of what's in development than in previous years and they've been cracking down on leaks; Microsoft has resorted to near-Apple levels of misdirection and internal need-to-know about some things (while maintaining a great deal of transparency about technical details). From what we hear, Russia is where a good deal of that cracking down has taken place. If all the sources of leaks have dried up, it's not surprising that the rumours are turning out to be so wrong, so often.

What does surprise me is how many people carry on listening to rumours from pundits who have a less than stellar track record. I'm happy to put my hand up when I've got it wrong (I was expecting a CES Windows 8 beta right up until the Building Windows blog said it would be the end of February, for example). Maybe we need a rumour-scoring service for tech pundits that keeps track of what we predict and what we get right? Now that would be a Klout score worth tweeting about...

(I'm currently unimpressed with Klout because it will not allow me to claim that I have expertise in either Windows 8 or snark; clearly Klout has not met me...)
marypcbuk: (Default)
For the second year in a row, I've done a set of Microsoft predictions for 2012 for TechRadar, rounding up what we know is coming for Windows 8, Windows Phone and Office, what we're predicting for Kinect and Andy Lees' mysterious new Windows/Windows Phone secret project and a few other nuggets. (Credit to Simon Bisson for letting me use his theory about what the Kinect TV rumours are really about in this piece.)

Maybe it's not so much thumbs up or thumbs down for Microsoft next year as whether it's everything to play for or everything to lose; 2011 has been an excellent year for Microsoft with good execution and few missteps - and too often it's missteps or not connecting the dots that do Microsoft in, rather than actively getting things wrong.

One area I think is important but that I just don't know enough about yet is the socially-oriented ideas coming out of the wonderfully named New England Research Division (NERD!) in Boston. I can feel some trip planning coming on...

Microsoft has had plenty of successes in 2011, from record-breaking sales for Kinect and Xbox to the positive reaction to Nokia's Windows Phone.

Windows 7 and Office are still selling well, Bing has managed some moderate increases in market share, especially in the US, and the departures of big names like Ray Ozzie and Robbie Bach haven't caused any ripples.

For the second year in a row, everyone is taking Microsoft seriously.

But when you do well, you have to do even better next time and 2012 could be a challenging year. Microsoft has to ship - and sell - Windows 8 (especially on tablets), Windows Phone has to compete with whatever Apple and Google can come up with next, IE10 has to keep up with Chrome and whatever ridiculous number Firefox gets up to and Microsoft still needs to impress users with its cloud services.

Xbox is still going strong and Kinect could revitalise the market for PCs that aren't all about being as thin and light as a MacBook Air but can Microsoft pull it all together?
Read the rest at TechRadar

marypcbuk: (Default)
It's a couple of weeks to the BUILD conference, the Building Windows 8 blog is starting to set the scene and I'm looking back at all the coverage I've already done of an OS most people won't use until next year. I'm not keen on writing about rumours, but I do like detective work; looking at job posts and architectural information to deduce the foundation something will be built on (and the never-publicly-acknowledged presentations that someone at HP leaked were a fascinating view of a work in progress).

Plus, I'm never playing poker with Steven Sinofsky: when we spoke at the 2009 PDC in LA I asked him flat out about Windows on ARM and he produced the most perfect poker face to say what sounded like no (Steven Sinofsky; the future of Windows: http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/sinofsky-the-thinking-behind-windows-8-663088).

But a few months later I did get a hint that ARM might be on the cards from Charlie Kindel on the Windows Phone team (Will Windows 8 run on ARM? http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-communications/mobile-phones/will-windows-8-run-on-arm-processors-683227) and we now know it will. We just don't quite know how...

What started out as a rumours piece for TechRadar has evolved over the months, with updates as we've found out more, so this is a mix of detective work and confirmations as news as come out: http://www.techradar.com/news/computing/pc/8-things-you-need-to-know-about-windows-8-643699

I've also been writing about specific topics: Will IE 10 need Windows at all - or why Microsoft won't 'do a Chrome' (which should reassure the still-panicking .NET developers and might explain why Microsoft thinks they've said enough to reassure them already): http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/web/microsoft-s-sinofsky-html5-doesn-t-mean-you-don-t-need-windows-677438

This was a job advert I found and used to predict the importance of Web apps in Windows 8; I'm calling this a successful prediction ;-) Web apps to get Windows 8 love http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/microsoft-s-windows-8-web-app-vision-906713

What Windows 8 on SoC means - or, yes, Windows apps can run on ARM, sometimes: http://ces2011.techradar.com/2011/01/what-does-windows-on-soc-mean-for-windows-8/

Windows 8 wishlist: this was written to be deliberately provocative and certainly got the discussion going, flames and all - I'm giving opinions rather than making predictions so I'm not going to score them...
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/windows-8-features-wishlist,review-1637.html

What IE10 means for Microsoft and Windows 8: more detective work, joining the dots on the standards going into IE10 and the Windows 8 touch interface http://www.techradar.com/news/software/applications/what-ie10-tells-us-about-windows-8-942732
How Windows 8 touch relies on IE10 http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/how-windows-8-touch-relies-on-ie10-971637
Similarly, predicting from the multitouch Microsoft mouse: What the Touch Mouse tells us about Windows 8 gestures http://www.techradar.com/news/computing-components/peripherals/windows-8-gestures-what-the-touch-mouse-tells-us-991070

What Windows 8 needs to compete on tablets: Microsoft telling me they'd been working on Windows 8 touch since before the iPad came out: http://www.techradar.com/news/mobile-computing/tablets/microsoft-we-know-where-we-re-going-with-windows-8-tablets-966757

Microsoft hints at a release date for Windows 8: the VP didn't say any more than I'd already calculated, but it was the first semi-official discussion and I broke the news - the first time I was top of a new section on TechMeme! http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/microsoft-hints-at-windows-8-release-date-966233

What we know about the Windows 8 timeline: another definite hit - there was a rumour of a Windows 8 CTP for the Partner Conference and I was convinced it wouldn't happen (it didn't): http://www.techradar.com/news/software/is-a-windows-8-release-date-announcement-close--977481
marypcbuk: (Default)
Although these two articles ended up being some time apart, I planned them to work together to explore just what's going on with the money side of the smartphone world. The mobile carriers are hugely profitable: several years back I worked out that in the UK they contribute as much to GDP as the oil and gas industry (for the UK that includes BP so it's not small, depending on the side issue of tax regimes - which applies equally to Vodafone) and as an ex-Ofcom analyst mentioned to me recently, they expect that to keep the political discussions away from them. Hah.

The handset makers make money: at least some of the time - Motorola has been posting a loss for a while (digression: has anyone considered that Google could be buying debt the way RIM did with the Nortel patents?) - but Apple's profits dwarf everyone else. Google makes money - a billion a year from mobile ads. Qualcomm is practically minting money, with fees on every phone for CDMA chipsets; the GSMA is at least distributing those fees between a variety of companies.

And then there's the whole OS situation: Android is free (as in puppy, I always say), Windows Phone has a licence, Symbian can't give itself away, BlackBerry is proprietary, Bada is coming up on the inside straight. Microsoft has patents (but has only ever started seven patent lawsuits), Nokia has patents and sues freely, Apple has patents but is getting sued as well as suing - and the Google situation is like a catherine wheel of implications sparking off in all directions.

So I was delighted to get two articles to really get my teeth into the situation - and to be reminded that putting a figure on any of this is impossibly hard because it's nearly all commercially confidential and the fees vary depending on who has what in their hand.

Microsoft's Patent Masterplan http://www.techradar.com/news/computing/how-microsoft-makes-money-from-android-986672

Who makes money from mobile phones? http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-communications/mobile-phones/who-s-making-money-from-your-smartphone--992247
marypcbuk: (Default)

Office 15 will be here next year. And, what's more, it'll be getting the Windows 8 look. There will also possibly be a Windows 8 authoring tool as well as HTML add-ins too.

I take a look at everything we know or can deduce about the Office 15 release date, interface, beta and other details

marypcbuk: (Default)
Ergonomic keyboards tend to be the pricier models — the 4000 model in the same Microsoft range as this one costs £50. However, the new Microsoft Comfort Curve Keyboard will cost just £20.

A little extra convenience, a little green power-saving and a very nice sleek keyboard make Logitech's K750 fairly environmentally friendly.

Of course what I'd really like would be a combination of the two; an ergonomic shape and a solar-powered wireless connection...
marypcbuk: (Default)

InTune is a cloud service for managing PCs remotely; in the first version it's all about managing Windows, which is all very well, but if a business has enough PCs to manage it has apps on them to manage as well. That's where Windows InTune 2 comes in.

Windows InTune 2 goes into beta: kew new features include licence management
http://www.cloudpro.co.uk/saas/1247/windows-intune-2-goes-beta

Does InTune 2 sound sweeter: what the new features mean http://www.cloudpro.co.uk/saas/1267/does-intune-2-sound-sweeter

marypcbuk: (Default)
The IE10 announcements have been a little understated, compared to IE9; I think that's partly because IE9 was a major step forward and IE10 is more incremental, IE9 had to make more of an impression - but I also think IE10 is powering so much of Windows 8 that until Microsoft is talking about Win8 it's hard to say much about IE10.

So I've not had so much to write about yet, but I am keen to see the beta...

What IE10 means for Microsoft and Windows 8 http://www.techradar.com/news/software/applications/what-ie10-tells-us-about-windows-8-942732
Hands on with IE10 platform preview 1 http://www.techradar.com/news/software/applications/hands-on-ie10-review-platform-preview--942710
IE10 platform preview 2 http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/web/what-s-new-in-internet-explorer-10-platform-preview-2-973065
marypcbuk: (Default)
I've been wanting to write about the secret of BizSpark for a while: why it makes complete sense for Microsoft to invest in giving software to startups, not because you can bribe anyone to use your technology but because startups are the future of your current customers. That turned into a piece for Cloud Pro on the way the cloud gives startups - well, a head start
http://www.cloudpro.co.uk/saas/1087/why-cloud-offers-head-start-new-businesses?page=0,0
marypcbuk: (Default)

What Windows 8 needs to compete on tablets - is Windows

Microsoft knows where it’s going with Windows 8 and that’s a very different direction from any other tablet maker. And it's been going there since before the iPad came along...

http://www.techradar.com/news/mobile-computing/tablets/microsoft-we-know-where-we-re-going-with-windows-8-tablets-966757


Microsoft hints at a release date for Windows 8
A senior ‘softie does the same calculation we’ve been doing for months and comes up with the same answer; more importantly, he reveals more about how Microsoft sees tablets, phones and PCs…

http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/microsoft-hints-at-windows-8-release-date-966233

marypcbuk: (Default)
Simon and I have been writing a series on managing PCs the modern way recently over on The Register; here's a roundup of most of the pieces I wrote, from helpdesk tools to what's different about managing a notebook to whether you really can let users buy their own PCs (fascinating discussion between users and IT admins in the comments on that one).

The challenges of desktop configuration
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/28/desktop_configuration/
Productivity: IT pros to the rescue
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/25/business_productivity/
Windows support tools
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/04/14/windows_support_tools/
Managing the desktop when it's a notebook
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/04/12/desktop_management_frameworks/
Automated patch management (I will note this one was edited for length and ends up with an unusually staccato delivery compared to my excessively discursive original)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/30/windows_patch_management/
Your PC our problem
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/19/consumerisation_of_it_what_can_users_buy/
marypcbuk: (Default)
From increasing the DPI to tweaking the delete gesture to something proofreaders will recognise. I'm amazed OEMs don't do most of these as standard on touch tablets, although what Windows 7 really needs is a pen and touch combo screen. If you can't afford that, or you're using a touch only screen until the Asus Eee tablet turns up, check out my tips at Tom's Guide.

http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Microsoft-Windows-7-Tablets,review-1629.html
marypcbuk: (Default)
Hands on IE9 RC: feature complete with WebM and geolocation - and some by-demand interface tweaks http://techradar.com/927657

Interview: How IE9 uses app reputation to axe malware when half all downloads are brand new every day http://t.co/Abf6NnF

Profile

marypcbuk: (Default)
marypcbuk

March 2022

S M T W T F S
  12 34 5
6 7 89101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 03:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios