- Wed, 14:49: RT @sbisson: Time to get rid of XP? I take a look at Windows 8.1 Enterprise for ZDNet. http://t.co/LsMwi9V1t6
- Wed, 14:56: but; US courts have said same RT @davewiner: Google. Of course email users expect privacy - you promised it to them http://t.co/oUJpyfNlEG
- Wed, 14:57: no expectation of privacy at your ISP; US case from 2007 http://t.co/L0OLT8DzX4
- Wed, 15:00: US IRS saying no expectation of email privacy http://t.co/tsjFosrh7k this is a legally messy area that needs examining
- Wed, 15:04: 2007, US appeals court overruling state court, saying you DO have email privacy in the US https://t.co/AmLArBqApH #legalhokeycokey
- Wed, 15:09: 2010 federal appeal court ruling https://t.co/D6FkDm57G4 affirms email expectation of privacy so why Google citing 1979 ruling on phone tap?
- Wed, 15:12: Simon's Cat in person (note the eyes!) RT @sbisson: Bentham by night: http://t.co/emQUnHZOVm
- Wed, 15:27: I don't care how far you ran & if you keep wasting electrons on how many people unfollowed you, I'll unfollow you myself #twitterhygiene
- Wed, 15:29: Really, automated tweets of your personal quantification should STAY personal; save the internet of things for other things please
- Wed, 15:35: If switching to Android would have been so great for Nokia and BlackBerry, why hasn't it helped Sony and LG, let alone HTC?